the God Connection through the eyes of a physicist
this was a contribution by Dr. Noel Huntley, written just before the Congress in May 2013
The ‘God connection’ will occur quite naturally to the degree of the understanding of what we mean by ‘God’. However, a merely objective understanding will not achieve this without subjective experiential familiarity. Nevertheless, since we have to use objective forms for communications, such as words, maths, graphs, etc. a good objective (and therefore potentially scientific and logical) description is the appropriate option.
Fractals is the first powerful approach to revealing the Source, and the simple tree example is recommended (twigs to branches to larger branches to one whole in the centre, the trunk—these are fractal levels)—remove the leaves for convenience. Within science there is recognition of the ubiquitous nature of fractals (it might be considered the greatest discovery in science and mathematics). But scientists (mainstream) haven’t used this knowledge to describe the structure of the universe (or multiverse of many universes). The fractal hierarchy is structured internally but we usually diagram it vertically. The holographic aspect reveals better the internal or inner nature, which is the ‘within’ of Christ’s teachings. But the true geometry is ‘spheres within spheres’. These spheres are pairs of higher dimensional vortices.
Briefly, the fractal path from 3D to Source would be through the centre of natural bodies such as atoms, planets, stars, etc.—the centre of the (double vortex) atom would internally connect to the centre of the planet; then star, galaxy, universe and back to Source. This is higher-dimensional geometry; one may see why it is not generally taught, in particular, it also reveals the free-energy source.
Our 3D universe is at the twig level in this fractal tree model. These universe fractal layers present an ordered structure of dimensions, ranging from low orders to high (e.g., large branches), and between these fixed divisions there is randomness for free play and choices to be made. This gives the immediate clues that the origination began at the top (the ‘top-down’ as opposed to the ‘bottom-up’ theory). A fractal system, or in this case the tree, begins at the trunk (in effect) and does not grow from the twig. What else does this tell us?
It tells us that the true basic intelligence is within creation/nature and true evolution. It is degree of order. Our society only recognises the IQ testing procedure, which is one form of intelligence—there are many. These are all subsets of the fundamental intelligence of order. In addition to intelligence, it is interesting to note that the fractal universe is presenting us (in a simple objective language format) with the true nature of the highest level of art (organisation within organisation within organisation, etc.); already spelled out for us and in fact puts to shame our failures to day of what art is. Also this is what ‘holy’ or ‘holiness’ means in religion (greater wholes, order, unity, integration). Consciousness projects into the universe fractal levels, like splitting up white light by means of a prism into its spectrum of colours, for the exploration of consciousness in different dimensional levels of orders and limitations for the evolution/ascension of the species to higher orders and return to Source.
As we link this with the objective/subjective principle we see that increasing order runs parallel with increasing integration, frequency (rate of information), and subjective/objective ratio. This is all increase in ‘intelligence’. Our 3D has a high coefficient of objectivity. As we look around, the environment appears totally separate from us and nothing to do with us—we could even get killed by it (such as in a tree fall). If we moved up the fractal hierarchy of universe layers to the next one, say, twig to branch, this would be the soul level. As we now look at the environment and act in it, it would be clear that the subjective/objective ratio has increased and that part of our mind appears to be ‘in’ the environment, that is, it can influence it, certainly for the better if that is what one chooses (e.g., by positive synchronicity).
Scientists are desperately trying to prove that life came from matter, that is, the higher order came from a lower order or randomness. This is logically unsound; there must be initial guidelines such as rules, blueprints, manifestation templates. The big problem to science is that when one has an explanation for something that is potentially hierarchical it can go into an infinite regression (causes behind causes). But we can see that the fractal system doesn’t. It has a natural end; the greatest integration or unity, a single state.
When we test out this approach what is at the top? We require an Absolute, otherwise we go into infinite regression looking for the primary cause. The Absolute must be beyond any shape, preference, bias, no dualism (must pass all the tests of truth in physics). There must be no particle, wavelength, frequency patterns, and of course (a natural consequence of the latter) no space or time. It is eternal— just a ‘thereness’ of infinite potential, in fact, not so far from the quantum realm of infinite possibilities of modern physics. It must be 100% subjective, which means no separation, just one whole and nothing outside it. It cannot have both conscious and unconscious (since that implies separation). Thus there is no unconsciousness.
When creation takes place, if that creation is to be given its separate reality, the Source must divide in some manner. This would be the first degree of objectivity (slight). To prevent merging back there must be a counteraction and the first glimmering of energy could be considered to appear—two opposing flows, the essence of mass. Compare water vapour being compressed and condensed into water or frozen into ice (a solid)—there is no dualism. The Source must retain its initial state, otherwise the fractal dimensional hierarchy cannot be manifested. This means we now have two levels. The ‘lower’ one can divide further (like the tree trunk projecting out a few large branches, then they project out smaller ones, etc.). How can this be achieved from a single source? It must create and project a ‘not-know’ on the objective component. But this will only exist on the lower level. We now have a small degree of objectivity and unconsciousness (but which would immediately disappear if the second level quantum leaps back to the first). However, the reduction to lower levels and multiplication of parts can continue, the lower levels becoming further away from Source—creating more finite conditions.
Let us use the ocean analogy to show how ‘substantial’ the Absolute is. Picture the ocean everywhere (all space) with wave patterns, whirls or whirlpools, etc. This model was used for the universe by leading quantum physicists and visionary scientists, who still subscribe to it. The ocean represents the all-encompassing space of the aether (proposed by scientists to carry electromagnetic waves). Since Einstein and colleagues couldn’t make this all-pervading aether covariant, the introduction of relativity enabled them to drop the notion (a disaster). For example, a small whorl in the surface (energy spinning out of 3D or into the ‘within’) was an electron. Note Schrodinger’s statement that all bodies/objects are like shapes and variations in the structure of space. If we now consider removing all energy and matter, that is, removing all waves and modulations of the ocean (Absolute), we do not have nothing left but in fact the whole basis of existences. This Absolute will contain the non-quantifiable, non-quantitative states, such as sentience/consciousness, the experiential, the essence of aliveness, and thus is very substantial. Thus there is no difference in the consciousness within an atom, a dog, or a human; only the quantity and formatting (programming) of the frequency patterns. Thus with this theory the ‘quantity’ of the Absolute, whether for an atom or human, is ‘framed’ by means of a template and can function separately to the degree of the fractalisation (branches to twigs).
Why doesn’t science detect the higher ‘spiritual’ levels? This is because science exclusively uses the experimental method of physical senses and scientific instruments, which are of relatively low order (low resolution) and unwittingly causes (secondary) collapse from a higher order/coherent state to lower, resulting in the most de-graded solutions to life’s most important issues (e.g., Big Bang theory). In spite of that, computer scientists are searching for coherent states and how to preserve them without collapsing the wave, in order to develop the quantum computer to utilise the quantum realm to compute on many states simultaneously.
Thus removing all energy and matter all the way to the highest levels of dimensions, science would claim there would be nothing left—this would be its definition of nothing. But as we can see, the ‘ocean’ (sea of consciousness) is the only thing that is real; all creations are simply modulations of it—simply representations (the wave/frequency patterns) and if given a causative role, as science does, one is dealing with illusions.
Reference: Book, The Emerging New Science, and www.nhbeyondduality.org.uk .
