We are used to think of truth as linear truth, i.e. one truth existing alongside of other truths and these all adding up to the truth.

This article highlights another aspect of truth, hierarchical truths…

Truth is hierarchical

and the consequences of their marriage for society

Going down into the microcosm of sub-atomic particles we find that one electron is just like another electron and no individuality is apparent. This means that the electrons are pure quantities that have no differential quality. Even molecules of a particular variety, unlike humans, cannot be distinguished from one another.
What could differentiate one electron from another is position in space. But as the quantum physicists have found out even the precise location cannot be found without losing momentum. It can be estimated and assigned a certain probability. This means that we have to have a group of electrons – to even calculate a probability – before one can find one. This could lead one to question if electrons even exist as individuals.

Quantity increase we know does not mean that the quality increases proportionally; higher mortgage payments do not automatically increase the quality of your real estate. Nor does it mean decrease in quality. So what is the relationship between these two similar sounding words? Total quantity with no quality is impossible, I will show later. Total quality with no quantities involved would be the quality of one single whole.

For our purposes we define quality as the essential character or the intrinsic, indispensable properties that serve to identify something. One could say quality is what makes something to what it is. Thus quality creates identity.

The word identity derives from Late Latin identitās, from Latin idem the same. Any number multiplied by one is that number, as one is the identity for multiplication. Identity can be represented by the number one.

That one cannot conceive of any quantity without quality can be proven mathematically. We take the number two, we see it is an abstraction, so we say two what? Okay.

Let’ say two cars. Now we have something to count and we cannot deny that these two are different cars and that both of them have some quality. However both are cars and as such they are identical, because counting them we only take their car-ness into account. From this, one can easily see that two or more cars can only be counted as such by virtue of the fact of the oneness of car-ness. A car as a concept is a whole, a unit and to count we need the concept not the individual qualities of those cars.

Two divided by two is one. All numbers are divisible by themselves and yield one, thus our reasoning completely proves that quantity cannot exist without a quality based on oneness. And that is why quantity and quality are forever married and quality has priority.

Quality or Essence can easily be proven –as per the above –to be primordial. So why does orthodox science and our monetized society insist on measuring everything before they can consider it real or valuable?

Caspar de Nada

Creation from nothing is not an oxymoron. Creation from nothing is inherent in the very nature of creation. But what exactly is nothing? Creation is an action designed to prove that some thing exists which did not exist before. Thus creation in this sense implies a time stream. If there is time then creation does not take place against a completely zero background. Still there was a relative zero, a no thing.

Remember what you read about quantum physics? Waves of probability that do not exist except in the calculations. Thus we could say—amongst us non-mathematicians—that there was nothing.

Creation from nothing, starts to make sense if we take into account the nature of the ‘no thing’. A thing is a contained entity, it has definition and identity and it stands out. The whole concept becomes clear at once when we adopt the following definition of creation:

Creation is the act of selecting and pressing the right keys on the infinite probability keyboard to produce the desired tune–the THING.

You may have to read up on Quantum Physics to appreciate this view. One could put it differently and still get the same result if one defines creation as the act of composing. In this case the tones of many octaves are available, it is then the act of selecting these in a certain pattern that creates the something, the concerto or whatever it will be. Even a cacaphony is something.

And there again we showed that creation from nothing, is not unreasonable after all. In closing I express the utmost respect and gratitude for those men and women who gave us the alphabeth, which allowed me to freely choose the letters and letter combinations I needed to express my thoughts and create this brief article.

by Multi Genius

Multi Genius is the pseudonym of Caspar de Nada-which incidentally means from nothing-who eclects and lives on the works of other members of our species generally giving them all full credit while adding his own flavors.

© Multi Genius Technologies, Un-Ltd 2014

If God exists he or it would have to be having some connection or be part of all of us. In other words omnipresent. Therefore it must be possible to find at least some common denominators in the way we individually experience God and the God Connection.

And so it must be possible to formulate a UNIVERSAL DECLARATION of GOD, a Definition we can all agree with.

I think that would be an interesting objective for the God Connection Congress in May 2013!

de Nada

One of our assumptions is that there is some entity we call God. Another assumption is that we read the letters forming this word from left-to-right.  I take the mathematician’s word for it that there is no proof that God does not exist, which incidentally leaves the atheist in a vulnerable position. Even if there is no personal God or a God of the type of which Nietsche declared he is dead, one would be wise to consider the possibility of one.